SynthesisPloS one2026
Hidden deficiency under bright skies: Vitamin D prevalence and genetic associations in African Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become a significant health challenge in Africa, with rapidly increasing prevalence. Despite abundant sunlight, vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is prevalent and may influence glucose metabolism and insulin resistance. Genetic factors, including vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms, may modify these effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of VDD and evaluate the association of VDR gene variants with T2DM among African populations.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for observational studies published up to June 11, 2025, reporting VDD prevalence and VDR genetic associations in African individuals with T2DM. Data extraction and quality assessment followed Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Pooled prevalence, mean difference and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were performed. All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.1 (2023-06-16 ucrt).
resultsTwenty-two eligible studies encompassing 3,447 participants from 11 African countries were included. The pooled prevalence of VDD among individuals with T2DM was 51% (95% CI: 36-65%), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 95.7%). Subgroup analyses showed highest prevalence in East Africa (56%). Vitamin D-deficient individuals had significantly higher HbA1c compared to sufficient individuals (mean difference = 0.89%; 95% CI: 0.06-1.72 p = 0.044; I2 = 0%, p = 0.49). The pooled analysis of VDR FokI polymorphisms did not demonstrate a significant association with T2DM risk (OR = 1.51; 95% CI: 0.23-9.73). No evidence of publication bias was detected.
conclusionVitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in African populations with T2DM and is associated with poorer glycemic control. Current evidence is insufficient to conclude on VDR FokI polymorphisms and T2DM risk. These findings underscore the need for interventional trials to determine whether improving vitamin D status enhances glycemic outcomes; routine screening or supplementation recommendations remain premature. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251134616.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.