ArticlePloS one2026
Associations between health-related social capital and oral frailty risk among older adults: A stratified analysis by socioeconomic status in the JAGES longitudinal study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough socioeconomic inequalities in oral health persist despite universal dental care, the role of social determinants remains unclear. Social capital may influence oral frailty, but evidence is limited, particularly regarding individual- and community-level social capital and differences by socioeconomic status (SES). This study examined these associations among community-dwelling older adults.
methodsWe analyzed longitudinal data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) collected at baseline (2019) and follow-up (2022), including 31,378 older adults. Social capital was assessed across three domains: civic participation, social cohesion, and reciprocity at individual and community levels. Oral frailty was estimated using a validated predictive model incorporating age, remaining teeth, chewing ability, and swallowing function. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between individual- and community-level social capital and oral frailty risk, as well as the interaction effects of social capital, stratified by SES, on oral frailty risk across SES groups. All models were adjusted for potential confounders, including sex, age, education, household composition, and chronic conditions.
resultsOver three years, 21.6% of participants developed oral frailty risk, with a higher incidence among low-SES participants (24.6%) than among high-SES participants (19.9%). At the higher individual level, higher health-related social capital and social cohesion were significantly associated with lower odds of oral frailty risk across SES groups. Higher civic participation was also associated with lower oral frailty risk across SES groups, with a stronger association observed among low-SES participants. At the community level, higher civic participation was associated with lower oral frailty risk in the overall sample and among low-SES participants. A significant interaction between SES and individual-level civic participation was observed, while no significant interactions were found for other social capital measures.
conclusionsIndividual-level health-related social capital was associated with a lower risk of oral frailty among older adults. Furthermore, the inverse association between civic participation and oral frailty was stronger among individuals with low socioeconomic status, suggesting that promoting social participation may be a promising strategy for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in oral frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.