ReviewHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2026
Microbiome and chronic pelvic pain in women: a mini-review.
Review in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a prevalent, disabling syndrome encompassing overlapping disorders such as endometriosis/adenomyosis, bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis, irritable bowel syndrome, vulvodynia, and myofascial pain syndrome. Despite distinct clinical phenotypes, these conditions converge on shared biological axes-immune dysregulation, endocrine imbalance, and central sensitization-that sustain chronic pain. Increasing evidence implicates the human microbiome as a potential upstream regulator of these pathways. Dysbiosis across the gut, vaginal, urinary, and endometrial microbial ecosystems may promote local and systemic inflammation, compromise epithelial barrier integrity, alter estrogen recirculation through the estrobolome, and engage aberrant neuroimmune signalling along gut-brain and hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian circuits. Recent multi-site profiling suggests that microbial alterations often co-occur across pelvic compartments but remain anatomically distinct, with shifts in anaerobic taxa and paired cervicovaginal immune signatures supporting microbiome-immune interactions in CPP pathophysiology. This narrative review synthesizes observational, multi-omics, and mechanistic evidence linking microbial dysbiosis to CPP, highlights microbial metabolites as key functional mediators, and evaluates causal data from experimental models. Finally, it discusses translational opportunities and limitations, including microbiome-targeted interventions (dietary modulation, probiotics/psychobiotics, postbiotics, and microbiota transfer approaches) and the need for harmonized, longitudinal and biomarker-embedded trials to enable mechanism-based stratification and rational therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.