ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Persona-Driven Data Augmentation for Disease Name Recognition Across Rare and General Disease Corpora: Comparative Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical information extraction requires automatically identifying disease names and related terms in text. This task, known as named entity recognition (NER), relies on expert-annotated data that are costly to produce and often available only in limited quantities. Data augmentation (DA) aims to expand available training data; however, standard techniques such as synonym replacement and back-translation may introduce inappropriate substitutions or fail to preserve entity-label alignment, which is critical for sequence-labeling tasks. Although large language models can generate fluent text, their outputs may also contain factual inconsistencies or unintended changes if not carefully controlled.
objectiveThis study investigated whether persona-driven, document-level DA using a large language model could improve biomedical disease NER performance by generating diverse rephrasings of medical documents while preserving annotated entities.
methodsWe designed a DA framework using multiple personas that varied in medical expertise, personality, tone, and narrative style. Using prompting constrained by XML tags, each persona rephrased training documents while aiming to preserve annotated entity spans. We evaluated the framework on 2 biomedical disease NER datasets with complementary roles: RareDis, a low-resource rare disease corpus, and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) disease, a more general disease benchmark. Semantic fidelity and lexical diversity were measured using BERTScore and Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU-4), respectively, and personas were grouped into high-, balanced-, and low-fidelity subsets. Biomedical pretrained BioBERT models were fine-tuned and evaluated under multiple settings, including gold-standard (GS) data only, synonym replacement, single-persona augmentation, curated persona subsets, and all-persona augmentation. Performance was assessed using microaveraged entity-level precision, recall, and F
resultsPersona-driven DA improved NER performance over GS-only training in both datasets, with the strongest gains obtained by combining multiple persona-generated variants with GS data. In RareDis, the best result was achieved by the low-fidelity subset (mean F
conclusionsPersona-driven DA improved biomedical disease NER by introducing controlled linguistic variation while largely preserving annotated entities. The strongest gains were obtained when multiple persona-generated variants were combined with GS data, although the benefit varied across datasets. These findings suggest that this approach is a promising strategy for low-resource biomedical NER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.