Evidence mapPaperPMID 42498296Full record

ReviewSeminars in neurology2026

Non-stenotic Carotid Disease: Review of the Literature and Case Discussion of TCAR for Treatment.

Tiffany Chu, Khadija Soufi, Jose Castillo, Anzhela Moskalik, Clayton Gerndt, Branden J Cord

Abstract readReviewCase Reports
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tiffany ChuCreighton University, School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States, Omaha.
Khadija SoufiUniversity of California Davis, Department of Neurosurgery, California, United States, Sacramento.
Jose CastilloUniversity of California Davis, Department of Neurosurgery, California, United States, Sacramento.
Anzhela MoskalikUniversity of California Davis, Department of Neurosurgery, California, United States, Sacramento.
Clayton GerndtUniversity of California Davis, Department of Neurosurgery, California, United States, Sacramento.
Branden J CordUniversity of California Davis, Department of Neurosurgery, California, United States, Sacramento.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Non-stenotic carotid disease represents an understudied yet clinically significant pathology. While stenosis is the primary mechanism underlying most strokes, other mechanisms such as thromboembolism from plaque rupture and carotid webs have been implicated in symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC). Studies have identified imaging features of high-risk non-stenotic plaques, but there is currently no standardized definition or imaging protocol for SyNC. Furthermore, despite current guidelines not recommending surgical intervention, an emerging body of literature suggests that carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting may be safe and effective treatments for SyNC. In this review, we provide an overview of the existing knowledge on SyNC, including a recently proposed working definition, the underlying pathophysiology, characteristics of vulnerable plaques, and current management strategies. Additionally, we present a case from our institution using transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) to treat SyNC, which, to our knowledge, is the first such report in the literature.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery DiseasesCerebral RevascularizationAgedEndarterectomy, CarotidHumansMaleStents

Identifiers

PMID42498296
PMCPMC13400088

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.