ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2026
Implementing a checklist to strengthen IMCI-based assessment of childhood illnesses in an urban primary care setting in Delhi: a quality improvement initiative.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren presenting to the outpatient department (OPD) with common complaints may have other underlying conditions. The Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) provides a comprehensive assessment for this. This study aimed to strengthen IMCI-based assessment by using a checklist by doctors among children aged 2 months to 5 years attending an urban primary health centre in Delhi through a quality improvement initiative.
methodsA baseline assessment with process mapping and root cause analysis was conducted to identify gaps in the existing system. Age-specific child health assessment checklists were introduced to standardise evaluation of danger signs, common conditions and malnutrition. This was implemented through two 6-week Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. In addition, a dedicated paediatric OPD room, improved anthropometry and availability of essential supplies were established.
resultsAfter the first PDSA cycle, complete assessment improved to 18.3%, and danger sign evaluation increased to 88.3%. By the second cycle, complete assessment reached 50%; danger sign assessment rose to 97.2%. Screening for cough improved from 86.8% to 100%, fever from 64.2% to 91.7%, diarrhoea from 13.2% to 94.5% and ear problems from 3.8% to 88.9%. Assessment for malnutrition increased from 23.1% to 94.4%, haemoglobin testing from 25% to 69.4%, and documentation of immunisation from 1.9% to 83.3%. However, there were concerns regarding sustainability, such as additional time required for consultation and irregular supplies.
conclusionThe intervention improved IMCI-based assessment, highlighting the value of simple, context-appropriate strategies while underscoring the requirement for continued implementation in resource-constrained primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.