ArticleScientific reports2026
Recognition of everyday activities using experiment data from wearable sensors: a deep learning-based framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracking everyday activities is vital for detecting changes in older adults' health, allowing timely support to promote well-being. Wearable sensors and deep learning provide continuous monitoring, making them a supportive tool in detecting such changes. However, a more refined method is needed to recognise precise activities with a minimal set of sensors. This study aimed to develop a method to recognise everyday activities among older adults by utilising wearable sensors and a deep learning model. This is a small-scale home lab experiment to develop a method to recognise 14 everyday activities. We compared five models that recognised everyday activities with different sensor signal counts and accuracy. Our results showed that sensor placement is important. Based on the results, we proposed a two-sensor method (pelvis and right hand) to collect and correctly recognise everyday activities among older adults. This model, which utilises two sensors, classified 12 activities with an accuracy of 89.3%. Another model recognised all 14 activities with a lower accuracy of 88.2% using five sensors. We also explored a one-sensor approach, which showed low recognition performance and struggled to distinguish activity variability. The two-sensor-based system will allow for large-scale data collection on everyday activities of older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.