Evidence mapPaperPMID 42498821Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

Pulmonary [

Hannah Torlot, Balaji Ganeshan, Thida Win, Helen Garthwaite, Luke R Hoy, Darren Walls, Raymond Endozo, Robert I Shortman, Francesco Fraioli, Nicholas J Screaton and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hannah TorlotUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Balaji GaneshanInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London /Hospital, 5th Floor, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Thida WinRespiratory Medicine, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Helen GarthwaiteInterstitial Lung Disease Service, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Luke R HoyInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London /Hospital, 5th Floor, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Darren WallsInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London /Hospital, 5th Floor, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Raymond EndozoInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London /Hospital, 5th Floor, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Robert I ShortmanInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London /Hospital, 5th Floor, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Francesco FraioliUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Nicholas J ScreatonDepartment of Radiology, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Joanna C Porter *UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK. joanna.porter@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-169X
Ashley M Groves *Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London /Hospital, 5th Floor, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleEffective prognostic biomarkers in Non-specific Interstitial Pneumonitis (NSIP) are limited.

objectiveTo investigate the potential of [

methodsNinety-six patients with a multidisciplinary team-confirmed diagnosis of NSIP (40 male, 56 female; mean age 59.8 ± 9.8 years) underwent baseline [

results65 patients died during a mean follow up of 83.2 ± 48.2 months. Mean ± SD SUV

conclusionHigh pulmonary [

Indexed as

Computed TomographyInterstitial Lung DiseaseNonspecific Interstitial PneumonitisPositron Emission TomographyPrognosis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.