ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Extended embryo culture and cumulative live birth in patients with limited embryos.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAmong IVF/ICSI patients with only 2-4 Day 3 embryos, which embryo culture strategy is associated with the highest cumulative live birth rate (CLBR): cleavage-stage transfer, blastocyst-stage transfer, or a mixed strategy?
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 5758 first IVF/ICSI cycles performed between January 2016 and May 2022. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to embryo culture strategy: cleavage group (all embryos transferred/frozen at Day 3, n = 1859), blastocyst group (all embryos cultured to Day 5, n = 529), and mixed group (1-2 best cleavage embryos transferred or cryopreserved, with the remainder cultured, n = 3370). The primary outcome was CLBR per oocyte retrieval cycle. Confounders were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression. In addition, a doubly robust approach combining inverse probability weighting (IPW) with regression adjustment was performed as a sensitivity analysis.
resultsCompared with the cleavage-stage group, the blastocyst-stage group had a significantly lower CLBR after one oocyte retrieval cycle (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.243, 95% CI 0.185-0.319 in logistic regression; aOR 0.345, 95% CI 0.271-0.437 in IPW). In contrast, the mixed group showed no significant difference in CLBR after adjustment (aOR 0.924, 95% CI 0.795-1.075 in logistic regression; aOR 0.978, 95% CI 0.867-1.103 in IPW).
conclusionsFor IVF patients with limited Day 3 embryos, a full blastocyst-stage strategy was associated with a substantially lower cumulative chance of live birth, whereas a mixed strategy did not improve CLBR compared with the cleavage-stage strategy after adjustment. These findings suggest that preserving transfer opportunities may be more important than further in vitro selection in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42498852What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.