Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498852›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026

Extended embryo culture and cumulative live birth in patients with limited embryos.

Huizi Jin, Wenju Peng, Jiejun Luo, Lei Jin, Jian-Qiao Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huizi JinCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenju PengDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China.
Jiejun LuoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lei JinCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Jian-Qiao LiuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. liujqssz@gzhmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4061-3333

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China 82371659Youth Science Fund Project 82404092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAmong IVF/ICSI patients with only 2-4 Day 3 embryos, which embryo culture strategy is associated with the highest cumulative live birth rate (CLBR): cleavage-stage transfer, blastocyst-stage transfer, or a mixed strategy?

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 5758 first IVF/ICSI cycles performed between January 2016 and May 2022. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to embryo culture strategy: cleavage group (all embryos transferred/frozen at Day 3, n = 1859), blastocyst group (all embryos cultured to Day 5, n = 529), and mixed group (1-2 best cleavage embryos transferred or cryopreserved, with the remainder cultured, n = 3370). The primary outcome was CLBR per oocyte retrieval cycle. Confounders were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression. In addition, a doubly robust approach combining inverse probability weighting (IPW) with regression adjustment was performed as a sensitivity analysis.

resultsCompared with the cleavage-stage group, the blastocyst-stage group had a significantly lower CLBR after one oocyte retrieval cycle (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.243, 95% CI 0.185-0.319 in logistic regression; aOR 0.345, 95% CI 0.271-0.437 in IPW). In contrast, the mixed group showed no significant difference in CLBR after adjustment (aOR 0.924, 95% CI 0.795-1.075 in logistic regression; aOR 0.978, 95% CI 0.867-1.103 in IPW).

conclusionsFor IVF patients with limited Day 3 embryos, a full blastocyst-stage strategy was associated with a substantially lower cumulative chance of live birth, whereas a mixed strategy did not improve CLBR compared with the cleavage-stage strategy after adjustment. These findings suggest that preserving transfer opportunities may be more important than further in vitro selection in this population.

Indexed as

Clinical embryologyCumulative live birth rateEmbryo attritionEmbryo transferExtended culture

Identifiers

PMID42498852

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.