Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498901›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Developing a psychological test battery to measure cognition in daily life.

Andrew J Aschenbrenner, Muchen Xi, Jeremy Cohn, Derek A Simon, Joshua J Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew J AschenbrennerUniversity of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, 4350 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Fairway, KS, 66205, USA. aaschenbrenner@kumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4317-7282
Muchen XiDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Jeremy CohnDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Derek A SimonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Joshua J JacksonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.

Funding

Within-person dynamics of cognition and personality in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease.K01AG071847 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ASCHENBRENNER, ANDREW · 2021 to 2025
$526k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG071847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognition is not a static process but is subject to substantial and meaningful variation within individuals over time. This has led to an increase in studies that aim to describe cognition in daily life by sampling participants repeatedly and remotely. Such studies, which we call high-frequency cognitive assessment or "HFCA", tend to use a limited number of brief cognitive tests. This focus on a small number of tests leaves open questions concerning the psychometric characteristics of a wide array of cognitive tasks useful for HFCA that can guide researchers on appropriate task selection. We developed the Cognitive Variability Battery (CVB), a series of nine cognitive tests clustered into three distinct cognitive domains: attentional control, processing speed, and episodic memory. CVB was administered to participants three times per day for 3 weeks. Cognitive tests were rotated to reduce the length of any single testing session. Each test was administered up to 60 times. We provide detailed descriptions of the performance of each task, including variability, skew, and reliability statistics, using intraclass correlations. We examine the sensitivity of each test to several contextual factors including stress, affect, and social interactions. Finally, we provide power analyses on each cognitive test to determine how many assessments and participants are needed to detect effects of interest. These analyses will be essential to anyone seeking to implement HFCA testing in their own research programs, by providing guidance on which cognitive tests to select and how many participants and observations may be needed.

Indexed as

CognitionNeuropsychological TestsAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMemory, EpisodicProcessing SpeedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultCognitionContextualHigh-frequencyMomentaryRemote

Identifiers

PMID42498901
PMCPMC13400683

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.