Evidence mapPaperPMID 42499080Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

Predicting stroke risk through the neutrophil-to-albumin ratio: A NHANES-based study with clinical validation.

Yuxuan Lei, Tianyu Zhu, Xinyu Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuxuan LeiSchool of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Tianyu ZhuSchool of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Xinyu LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zhenjiang First People's Hospital, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-0510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a major global health issue, and inflammation plays a key role in its pathogenesis. The neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) is a novel inflammatory biomarker reflecting inflammation and oxidative stress. However, its association with stroke remains unclear. This cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2020. The association between NPAR and stroke was assessed by determining NPAR and employing various analytical methods, including weighted univariate logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression models. Furthermore, a risk prediction nomogram was developed, and its efficacy was validated through the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A total of 393 clinical cases were selected, comprising 193 stroke patients and 200 non-stroke patients. The disease data were validated using bootstrap methods, while clinical data underwent logistic regression analysis and T test to confirm compliance with the established NPAR prediction model. The median NPAR of stroke patients was significantly higher than that of non-stroke patients (14.53 vs 13.72, P < .01). RCS analysis demonstrated a positive association between NPAR and stroke risk, especially when NPAR > 13.75. Subgroup analyses showed that this association remained stable in subgroups such as gender, ethnicity, hypertension, coronary heart disease, etc. The LASSO regression model further identified 13 factors closely related to stroke, such as age, ethnicity, high-density lipoprotein, and hypertension, and constructed a nomogram model with high predictive performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 84%). The T test analysis of clinical data revealed a statistically significant difference in NPAR between stroke and non-stroke groups, as well as between low-risk and high-risk stroke classifications (P < .0001). Findings from the clinical cohort were consistent with those of the NHANES analysis. This suggests that NPAR can not only predict the risk of stroke but also reflect its severity. A nonlinear positive association has been observed between NPAR and stroke, a connection that persists regardless of multiple confounding variables. NPAR may function as a crucial indicator for stroke risk, particularly among men. Given the cross-sectional design, further longitudinal studies are needed to establish causality and explore the underlying mechanisms linking inflammation to stroke.

Indexed as

NeutrophilsSerum AlbuminStrokeAgedBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInflammationLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsNutrition SurveysRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiomarkersSerum Albumininflammationneutrophil-to-albumin ratioNHANESrisk predictionstroke

Identifiers

PMID42499080
PMCPMC13406188

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.