ArticleMedicine2026
Body roundness index and self-reported oral health among US adults: Nonlinear patterns and an exploratory indirect association through the systemic immune-inflammation index.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence linking body roundness index (BRI) to self-reported oral health is limited. We examined this association, nonlinearity, subgroup differences, and an indirect association through the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). This cross-sectional study included 14,656 adults from the 2009 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Self-reported oral health was analyzed as a 5-level ordered outcome. Survey-weighted ordinal logistic regression, restricted cubic spline, fixed-folding point, subgroup, and threshold-specific sensitivity analyses were performed. Exploratory mediation analysis used 1000 bootstrap simulations. In the fully adjusted model, each 1-unit increase in BRI was associated with higher cumulative odds of poorer self-reported oral health (odds ratio [OR], 1.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.055-1.097). Compared with the lowest BRI tertile, the OR for the highest tertile was 1.448 (95% CI, 1.272-1.647). The spline showed modest nonlinearity (P = .048). Below the fixed-folding-point at BRI = 10, the OR was 1.092 (95% CI, 1.063-1.120); above 10, the association was attenuated (OR, 0.978; 95% CI, 0.913-1.048). Although the proportional-odds assumption was not fully supported (P = .011), threshold-specific ORs remained positive (1.065-1.099). Interactions were significant for age and education level. SII accounted for 3.06% (95% CI, 0.99%-5.82%) of the association. Higher BRI was associated with poorer self-reported oral health among US adults. The association varied modestly across thresholds and attenuated at higher BRI levels, while SII explained only a small proportion. Prospective studies with clinical dental assessments are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.