ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2026
Comparison between liraglutide and dulaglutide on the incidence or progression of eye and kidney complications.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate and compare the risk of diabetic retinopathy and kidney disease between once-daily liraglutide and once-weekly dulaglutide in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 331 participants newly initiated on once-daily liraglutide 0.9 mg or once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg between 2015 and 2020 were included in this study. We used propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for baseline characteristics between the two groups. The participants were divided into three cohorts according to retinopathy, albuminuria, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The primary outcomes were the incidence or progression of diabetic retinopathy or kidney disease (albuminuria or reduced estimated GFR (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m
resultsOver a mean follow-up of 4.4 and 3.6 years in the liraglutide and dulaglutide groups, respectively, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of the risk of incidence of retinopathy and reduced GFR (hazard ratio (HR): 0.98 [0.60-1.60] and 0.82 [0.36-1.84]). Dulaglutide showed a lower incidence or progression rate but similar risk of albuminuria compared to liraglutide (54.7 vs 25.8 per 1,000 person-years (P = 0.04), HR: 0.51 [0.25-1.05]).
conclusionsOur study showed that once-daily liraglutide and once-weekly dulaglutide have similar risks for retinopathy, albuminuria, and reduced GFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.