ArticleInternational journal of MS care2026
Perceptions of People With Multiple Sclerosis Who Practice Tai Chi and/or Qigong: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in International journal of MS care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExercise is important for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) to manage symptoms and improve quality of life. Tai chi and qigong (TCQ) are mind-body exercises shown to benefit physical, emotional, and cognitive health in many conditions, but research has been limited in people with MS. To understand potential benefits from regular TCQ practice and factors influencing feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability, we conducted a mixed-methods study through a survey and focus groups with people with MS who regularly practice TCQ.
methodsWe conducted focus groups with people with MS from across the United States who regularly practice TCQ; the data from these groups were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Participants also completed a brief survey that collected data on demographics, MS health history and symptoms, and TCQ practice (including opinions on content, dosage, and delivery).
resultsThirteen people with MS (85% female, 69% White) participated in the study. Reported TCQ benefits included physical (balance, strength), cognitive (memory), psychological (calming), and social (community building), with a dose-response gain over time. Challenges included learning and remembering movements, physical limitations (strength, endurance, fatigue), and transportation barriers. Adaptations specific to MS included tailoring TCQ content to meet individual needs and symptoms, appropriate pace, online delivery, and safety. Keys to sustainable practice included enjoyment, patience and self-compassion, viewing TCQ as medicine, and scheduling time for practice.
conclusionsResults suggest people with MS who maintain a TCQ practice may experience physical, emotional, cognitive, and social benefits, especially when specific practice details and facilitators are met. Future studies might investigate how these factors influence sustainable practice.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.