Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499339›Full record

ArticleeLight2026

Temporally plastic photonic processor for real-time adaptive computing.

Lingzhi Luo, Yizhi Wang, Zhiwei Xue, Yanzhi Chen, Chunhui Yao, Senbiao Qin, Peng Bao, Jing Zhang, Kangning Xu, Minjia Chen and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Lingzhi Luo *Electrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Yizhi Wang *Electrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Zhiwei XueDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yanzhi ChenMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK.
Chunhui YaoElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Senbiao QinPhotonics Research Group, Ghent University-IMEC, Ghent, Belgium.
Peng BaoElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jing ZhangPhotonics Research Group, Ghent University-IMEC, Ghent, Belgium.
Kangning XuGlitterinTech Limited, Xuzhou, China.
Minjia ChenElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ting YanGlitterinTech Limited, Xuzhou, China.
Yuxiao YeGlitterinTech Limited, Xuzhou, China.
Liang MingGlitterinTech Limited, Xuzhou, China.
Gunther RoelkensPhotonics Research Group, Ghent University-IMEC, Ghent, Belgium.
Jianji DongWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tawfique HasanElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ian WhiteDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Richard PentyElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lu FangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Qixiang ChengElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-2102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time intelligent systems increasingly require hardware that can adapt continuously to evolving inputs, yet most existing processors rely on static-weight inference, making them vulnerable to distribution shifts and error accumulation in dynamic environments. Although adaptive weight updates can, in principle, address this limitation, their implementation on electronic hardware is hindered by the stability-plasticity trade-off, as well as by the memory wall and clocking bottlenecks that become particularly severe in sequential processing. Here, we present a Temporally Plastic Photonic Processor (TPPP) that enables ultra-fast in situ adaptation by combining multi-timescale photonic kernels with a recursive optical delay memory. The architecture integrates a slow, reconfigurable kernel for stable long-term processing and a fast, dynamic kernel for transient adaptation, enabling time-varying weights to be embedded directly in the photonic domain without repeated electronic memory access. We experimentally validate the TPPP on linear and nonlinear sequential tasks. In both regimes, data-driven temporal plasticity enables the TPPP to outperform conventional static photonic baselines in robustness and accuracy. Under an operation-matched INT8 comparison, scaling analysis projects up to 16 × higher per-operation energy efficiency and up to 100 × lower intrinsic single-pass compute delay than advanced electronic processors, establishing the TPPP as a promising hardware framework for real-time adaptive photonic computing. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43593-026-00139-8.

Identifiers

PMID42499339
PMCPMC13396080

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.