ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2026
Comprehensive geriatric assessment identifies multidimensional vulnerabilities in older adults with heart failure.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Heart failure (HF) in older adults is frequently accompanied by geriatric syndromes that remain unrecognized in conventional cardiac evaluations. The vulnerabilities of older adults with and without HF in terms of muscle strength, physical performance, functional capacity, frailty, nutritional status, cognition, mood, anxiety, polypharmacy, and comorbidity were investigated using comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in two academic outpatient clinics, enrolling 420 adults aged ≥60 years, including 92 (21.9%) with HF. Data included sociodemographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and CGA parameters: handgrip strength, the Five-Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL (IADL), the FRAIL scale, the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, the Mini-Cog, the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. Results: HF participants had slower FTSST (12.7 s versus 11.7 s; p = 0.002), and lower SPPB scores (10.0 versus 11.0; p = 0.016). IADL scores were significantly lower in the HF group (median, 7.0 versus 8.0; p < 0.001), indicating a higher prevalence of IADL impairment. Frailty (31.5% versus 18.9%; p = 0.009), malnutrition (6.5% versus 2.1%; p = 0.043), cognitive impairment (29.3% versus 14.3%; p = 0.001), and polypharmacy (88.0% versus 57.9%; p < 0.001) were significantly more prevalent in the HF group. Low lower extremity muscle strength (OR = 3.713), impaired IADL (OR = 4.974), and higher comorbidity burden (OR = 1.603) were identified as independent factors associated with HF in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Older adults with HF showed substantial deficits across multiple CGA domains, including functional capacity, frailty, nutrition, and cognition. Integration of CGA into HF management may facilitate the identification of previously unrecognized vulnerabilities and support multidisciplinary care planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.