Trial reportFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Bioequivalence study of vonoprazan fumarate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects: a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover trial.
Trial report in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of a test formulation (Vonoprazan Fumarate Tablets, 20 mg, T) compared with the reference product (Takecab®, 20 mg, R) in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. Methods: This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period, crossover study. Seventy-two healthy subjects were enrolled and assigned to either a fasting (n = 32) or a fed (n = 40) cohort. In each period, subjects received a single dose of either the test (T) or reference (R) formulation, separated by a 5-day washout period before crossing over to the alternate treatment. Plasma vonoprazan concentrations were quantified using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Bioequivalence was assessed by determining whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs, T/R) of C Results: Seventy of the 72 enrolled subjects completed the study. Under fasting conditions, the GMRs (90% CIs) for C Conclusion: The test formulation of vonoprazan fumarate is bioequivalent to the reference formulation and is well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.searchlistdetail.dhtml, identifier CTR20233597.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.