Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499490›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Bioequivalence study of vonoprazan fumarate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects: a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover trial.

Jin Yu, Sisi Lin, Yongjie Luo, Yamin Deng, Haifeng Yin, Hong Sun, Jingzhi Yu, Yiwen Zhang

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin YuCenter for Clinical Pharmacy, Cancer Center, Clinical Research Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Sisi LinCenter for Clinical Pharmacy, Cancer Center, Clinical Research Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yongjie LuoCenter for Clinical Pharmacy, Cancer Center, Clinical Research Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yamin DengCenter for Clinical Pharmacy, Cancer Center, Clinical Research Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Haifeng YinHaikou Pharmaceutical Factory Co., Ltd., Haikou, Hainan, China.
Hong SunHaikou Pharmaceutical Factory Co., Ltd., Haikou, Hainan, China.
Jingzhi YuHaikou Pharmaceutical Factory Co., Ltd., Haikou, Hainan, China.
Yiwen ZhangCenter for Clinical Pharmacy, Cancer Center, Clinical Research Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of a test formulation (Vonoprazan Fumarate Tablets, 20 mg, T) compared with the reference product (Takecab®, 20 mg, R) in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. Methods: This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period, crossover study. Seventy-two healthy subjects were enrolled and assigned to either a fasting (n = 32) or a fed (n = 40) cohort. In each period, subjects received a single dose of either the test (T) or reference (R) formulation, separated by a 5-day washout period before crossing over to the alternate treatment. Plasma vonoprazan concentrations were quantified using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Bioequivalence was assessed by determining whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs, T/R) of C Results: Seventy of the 72 enrolled subjects completed the study. Under fasting conditions, the GMRs (90% CIs) for C Conclusion: The test formulation of vonoprazan fumarate is bioequivalent to the reference formulation and is well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.searchlistdetail.dhtml, identifier CTR20233597.

Indexed as

bioequivalenceHPLC-MS/MSpharmacokineticspotassium-competitive acid blockervonoprazan fumarate

Identifiers

PMID42499490
PMCPMC13396015

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.