ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Photodynamic therapy for oral mucosal lesions: photosensitizer evolution, pharmacological mechanisms, and clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral mucosal lesions (OMLs) comprise a diverse group of diseases affecting the oral mucosal tissues. Traditional treatments such as medication, surgery, laser therapy, and cryotherapy often produce significant side effects, including high recurrence rates due to drug resistance-associated recurrence and considerable tissue trauma, leading to unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), which uses photosensitizers, light at specific wavelengths, and oxygen to generate cytotoxic effects that induce cell apoptosis and necrosis, cause immunogenic cell death and microcirculation damage, and trigger local immune responses, has emerged as a promising minimally invasive alternative. PDT offers advantages including strong selectivity, minimal invasiveness, high targeting capability, and repeatable administration. However, clinical translation remains constrained by pharmacological barriers including restricted tissue penetration depth of therapeutic light, absence of standardized treatment protocols, and insufficient long-term efficacy data. This comprehensive review systematically examines the evolutionary development of photosensitizer generations, explores synergistic combination strategies integrating PDT with complementary therapeutic modalities, and critically evaluates current clinical applications across common OMLs types. By synthesizing current evidence and identifying knowledge gaps regarding drug-target interactions, this review aims to provide a robust foundation for advancing therapeutic agent development and guiding future research directions in PDT-based management of OMLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.