ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Drug-induced adverse events in modern pharmacotherapy: mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and implications for risk assessment and management.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-induced adverse events remain a major challenge in modern pharmacotherapy, particularly with the increasing use of targeted therapies, biologics, and combination regimens. In clinical practice, toxicity is often difficult to predict, interpret, and manage because adverse events arise from complex interactions between drug mechanisms, patient susceptibility, and treatment context. This review provides a clinically oriented framework for understanding drug-induced adverse events across multiple levels. We first summarize key mechanistic drivers, including pathway perturbation, off-target effects, metabolic and mitochondrial dysfunction, and immune dysregulation. We then discuss how these mechanisms translate into organ-specific toxicity patterns involving the liver, heart, kidney, nervous system, and immune system, which represent the most common clinical presentations. In addition, we examine how safety profiles are defined and refined through different layers of evidence, including randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and real-world pharmacovigilance data. These complementary evidence sources are essential for identifying both common and rare adverse events, particularly those that emerge after broader clinical use. Importantly, this review highlights practical considerations for clinical risk assessment and management. We discuss key factors influencing toxicity risk, including patient comorbidity, polypharmacy, and baseline organ function, as well as the role of dynamic monitoring, biomarkers, and early signal detection. Emphasis is placed on translating mechanistic insight into actionable strategies for prevention, early recognition, and individualized management of adverse events. Overall, drug safety should be viewed as a dynamic and context-dependent process. Integrating mechanistic understanding with clinical evidence and real-world data can improve risk prediction and support more effective and personalized pharmacotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.