ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Self-worth systems in aging societies: a narrative review and conceptual framework from self-esteem to healthy longevity.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging societies face not only challenges of health care, dependency and disease burden, but also a psychosocial challenge: how to preserve older adults' sense that their lives, choices, relationships and contributions continue to matter. This narrative review and conceptual framework examines later-life self-worth as a multilevel system shaped by personal, relational, institutional, cultural and policy conditions. We distinguish self-worth from global trait self-esteem and define later-life self-worth as the perceived significance of one's life, agency, dignity, contribution and social visibility under changing conditions of capacity and dependency. The proposed framework organizes self-worth around six dimensions: autonomy, dignity, mattering, reciprocity, role continuity and social visibility. We synthesize evidence on social connection, loneliness, reciprocity, retirement, ageism, functional decline, long-term care, digital exclusion and cultural disruption, while also identifying areas where evidence is indirect, heterogeneous or primarily correlational. We argue that self-worth may influence healthy aging through psychological, behavioral, social, cognitive and stress-related biological pathways, but that causal claims remain limited and require longitudinal, experimental and mixed-method research. Finally, we discuss strategies for preserving self-worth, including autonomy-supportive environments, dignity-centered care, social prescribing, intergenerational programs and digital inclusion. Healthy longevity should therefore be understood not only as survival, function or disease control, but also as the preservation of a life that is recognized, chosen, connected and meaningful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.