Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499644›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026

Substance use risk among school going adolescents in India: secondary analysis of Community Based Peer-Led Intervention (CPLI) trial.

U Venkatesh, Mahashweta Chakrabarty, Palanivel Chinnakali, Krupal Joshi, Sudip Bhattacharya, Aravind P Gandhi, Rashmi Agarwalla, Richa Tripathi, Vinoth Rajendran, Anand Mohan Dixit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

U VenkateshDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mahashweta ChakrabartyDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Palanivel ChinnakaliDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Krupal JoshiDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science -Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Sudip BhattacharyaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Aravind P GandhiDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Rashmi AgarwallaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, India.
Richa TripathiDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Gorakhpur, India.
Vinoth RajendranDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anand Mohan DixitDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescent substance use is an increasing public health concern in India, yet multicentre studies are limited. In this study we aimed to understand variation in substance use risk across multiple schools in selected districts of India. Methods: This study utilised cross-sectional baseline data from a multi-centre cluster randomised trial on peer-led intervention to reduce substance use, it included 6168 adolescents from 108 schools across six Indian districts (2025-2026). Substance use risk was assessed through self-reporting of participants using the WHO Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test and personality traits were assessed using the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS). Determinants were examined using three-level multilevel ordinal logistic regression models accounting for clustering at school levels. Inter-district disparities were investigated using Fairlie decomposition. Findings: Highest substance use risk was observed in selected schools of Guwahati and lowest in Nagpur and Puducherry. Higher accessibility to substances (high: aOR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.36-2.26), high digital exposure (aOR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.16-1.79), and favourable attitudes towards substance use (aOR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.01-1.69) were associated with increased risk, whereas male adolescents had lower odds than females (aOR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.88). The Guwahati-Nagpur prevalence gap was 35.1 percentage points, of which 37.9% was explained by observed characteristics, mainly school characteristics, socio-demographic and economic factors, and personality traits. Interpretation: Substance use risk among adolescents in India varies substantially across settings. Context-specific strategies targeting digital exposure, and local environments may help reduce inequalities in substance use risk. Funding: This study is supported by Indian Council of Medical Research, Extramural Research Grant (2024-01-00480).

Indexed as

AdolescentsASSISTAyushman BharatFairlie decompositionIndiaRegional inequalitySchool Health ProgrammeSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID42499644
PMCPMC13396925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.