Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499668›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026

Monthly trends, determinants, and forecasting of perinatal mortality in Ghana: a comparison of ARIMA, BPNN, DLNN, and GRNN models.

Agyei Helena Lartey, Denis Dekugmen Yar, Ama Asamaniwa Attua, Godfred Nyanney, Akuffo Samuel Tete Manukure, Isaac Takyi Boahen, Theophilus Oduro Kankam, Collins Mawuli Bakudie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Agyei Helena LarteyDepartment of Public Health Education, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Mampong, Ghana.
Denis Dekugmen YarDepartment of Public Health Education, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Mampong, Ghana.
Ama Asamaniwa AttuaDepartment of Public Health Education, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Mampong, Ghana.
Godfred NyanneyDepartment of Public Health Education, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Mampong, Ghana.
Akuffo Samuel Tete ManukureDepartment of Public Health Education, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Mampong, Ghana.
Isaac Takyi BoahenDepartment of Public Health Education, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Mampong, Ghana.
Theophilus Oduro KankamDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Mampong, Ghana.
Collins Mawuli BakudieDepartment of Health Information, Ghana Health Service, Mampong, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perinatal mortality is a critical indicator of the quality of maternal and newborn care across sub-Saharan Africa. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis estimated Ghana's pooled perinatal mortality rate at 44.8 per 1,000 births, highlighting ongoing barriers to meeting Sustainable Development Goal targets for neonatal survival. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, hospital-based time series analysis of 192 monthly observations from January 2010 through December 2025. Perinatal mortality rate (PMR) was defined as the sum of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths per 1,000 births. Stationarity was evaluated using the Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test. Forecasting performance was compared across four models-ARIMA, backpropagation neural network (BPNN), deep learning neural network (DLNN), and generalized regression neural network (GRNN)-with model validation performed on a 2025 temporal holdout. Results: The hospital recorded 46,108 live births and 1,152 perinatal deaths, giving an overall PMR of 24.98 per 1,000 births. The undifferenced monthly PMR series was borderline non-stationary (ADF statistic -2.695; Conclusion: Perinatal mortality declined over the long term but remained unstable. Among the evaluated models, ARIMA showed the best out-of-sample accuracy, while GRNN was the strongest neural-network comparator. Forecasts should be interpreted as operational projections rather than causal predictions.What is already known on this topic?Perinatal mortality remains high in many low- and middle-income countries, and stillbirths plus early neonatal deaths continue to contribute substantially to under-5 mortality in Ghana ( 1- 6).What this study addsThis study provides a 16-year monthly hospital time series, compares classical time-series forecasting with three neural-network approaches, and demonstrates that better ANC coverage and lower hypertension burden track with lower monthly PMR in this setting.How this study might affect research, practice, or policyMonthly PMR surveillance may help maternity hospitals monitor service quality, and ARIMA-based operational forecasting may assist planning for high-risk periods while service-improvement efforts focus on ANC utilization and maternal complication control.

Indexed as

antenatal care coverageARIMAforecastingghanahypertensive disorders in pregnancymaternal healthneural networksperinatal mortality

Identifiers

PMID42499668
PMCPMC13396253

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.