Genetic Determinants of Cellular Homeostasis Contributing to the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes.

Y R Timasheva, O V Kochetova, T R Nasibullin, T M Kochetova, Z Balkhiyarova, G F Korytina, A Nouwen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Acta naturae. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Y R TimashevaInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, 450054 Russia.

O V KochetovaInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, 450054 Russia.

T R NasibullinInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, 450054 Russia.

T M KochetovaBashkir State Medical University, Ufa, 450008 Russia.

Z BalkhiyarovaBashkir State Medical University, Ufa, 450008 Russia.

G F KorytinaInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, 450054 Russia.

A NouwenDepartment of Psychology, Middlesex University, London, NW4 4BT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation in the genes involved in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis may influence susceptibility to type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the nature of the interplay among these loci and their prognostic value remains unclear. In this study, we analyzed variants in the FOXO3A, FOXO3, FOXO1, HMOX1, and SIRT1 genes. The HMOX1 rs2071746*T/T genotype was associated with an increased risk of T2D (OR = 1.36, PFDR = 0.030), whereas the FOXO1 rs9549240 (OR = 0.52, PFDR = 0.002) and SIRT1 rs3758391 (OR = 0.80, PFDR = 0.015) genotypes exhibited a protective effect. We detected nonlinear interactions, including FOXO1 rs9549240*G + SIRT1 rs3758391*T + SIRT1 rs7895833*A and HMOX1 rs2071746*A + SIRT1 rs3758391*T + SIRT1 rs7895833*A, with significant synergistic effects (SF = 3.19 and 2.56, P < 0.03). Models incorporating these interactions achieved an AUC of 69.8%, which increased to 86.2% when combined with age, sex, and the body mass index. These findings suggest that interactions between the pathways regulating oxidative stress and metabolism may contribute to the genetic predisposition to T2D.

Indexed as

insulin signalingoxidative stresspolygenic risk scoreType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42499674

DOI10.32607/actanaturae.27855

PMCPMC13399642

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.