ArticleJPGN reports2026
Complementary and alternative medicine use by patients in pediatric gastroenterology clinics.
Article in JPGN reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies among children seen in pediatric gastroenterology (GI) clinics is high. Multiple CAM therapies are effective as primary and adjuvant therapies for GI disorders and symptoms. Our study aimed to define the historical use of CAM and interest in CAM therapies in a specialized integrative medicine (IM) clinic among patients within an academic pediatric GI practice in the United States. Methods: We conducted a survey of pediatric patients in outpatient GI clinics. Collected information included patient and caregiver demographics, GI symptoms, GI diagnoses, historical CAM use, interest in learning more about CAM therapies, and interest in an IM clinic. Associations between CAM use or interest and patient or caregiver demographics were tested using chi-square. Results: A total of 392 pediatric patients participated (47.2% female). The most common symptoms were abdominal pain (43.4%), constipation (34.7%), and reflux (25.8%). The most common GI disorders were eosinophilic esophagitis (11%), either irritable bowel syndrome or functional abdominal pain (4.3%), and inflammatory bowel disease (3.8%). Prior CAM use was reported by 35.7%. Respondents were most interested in learning more about supplements (36.7%), probiotics (30.6%), and yoga (18.9%). Approximately 86% of patients expressed interest in an IM clinic. Conclusions: CAM use in our study is high. A large majority of respondents are interested in a clinic for complementary care. Our study highlights the support for ongoing education for physicians and patients, deeper investigation into CAM use for pediatric GI patients, and the creation of integrative clinical programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.