SynthesisRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2026
Metformin + Insulin vs. Insulin for GDM and T2DM during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adding metformin to insulin (M+I) versus insulin alone for pregnant women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), focusing on stillbirth as the primary outcome. Sources of data: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched. No date limits. Last search: January 2025. Eligibility criteria: Randomized clinical trials including women with T2DM or GDM were eligible. Trials restricted to type 1 diabetes were excluded. Data collection and synthesis: Two reviewers extracted maternal and neonatal outcomes and assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Evidence certainty was graded using GRADE. Data were pooled with random-effects models and reported as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Nine RCTs (2,420 women) were included, most with GDM and some with T2DM. Moderate-quality evidence indicated reduced stillbirth risk with M+I (6 RCTs, 2,196 participants; RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.90; NNT 111). Low-quality evidence suggested lower risks of gestational hypertension (4 RCTs; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97) and neonatal hypoglycemia (7 RCTs; RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80). No significant differences were found for cesarean section, preterm delivery, or other neonatal outcomes. Heterogeneity, baseline imbalances, and small samples limited certainty. Conclusions: M+I may reduce stillbirth and some adverse outcomes compared with insulin alone, but most evidence remains low certainty. Further high-quality RCTs are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.