Evidence mapPaperPMID 42500179Full record

SynthesisRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2026

Metformin + Insulin vs. Insulin for GDM and T2DM during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Christiano Hallack, Bernardo Vieira Nogueira, Maressa Bomfim, Nathália Meireles, Wellington Martins

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christiano HallackCentro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos TeresópolisRJ Brazil Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos, Teresópolis, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8527-3022
Bernardo Vieira NogueiraCentro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos TeresópolisRJ Brazil Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos, Teresópolis, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8860-0946
Maressa BomfimCentro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos TeresópolisRJ Brazil Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos, Teresópolis, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7751-6201
Nathália MeirelesCentro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos TeresópolisRJ Brazil Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos, Teresópolis, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5287-5842
Wellington MartinsSEMEAR Fertilidade Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil SEMEAR Fertilidade, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-5607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adding metformin to insulin (M+I) versus insulin alone for pregnant women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), focusing on stillbirth as the primary outcome. Sources of data: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched. No date limits. Last search: January 2025. Eligibility criteria: Randomized clinical trials including women with T2DM or GDM were eligible. Trials restricted to type 1 diabetes were excluded. Data collection and synthesis: Two reviewers extracted maternal and neonatal outcomes and assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Evidence certainty was graded using GRADE. Data were pooled with random-effects models and reported as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Nine RCTs (2,420 women) were included, most with GDM and some with T2DM. Moderate-quality evidence indicated reduced stillbirth risk with M+I (6 RCTs, 2,196 participants; RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.90; NNT 111). Low-quality evidence suggested lower risks of gestational hypertension (4 RCTs; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97) and neonatal hypoglycemia (7 RCTs; RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80). No significant differences were found for cesarean section, preterm delivery, or other neonatal outcomes. Heterogeneity, baseline imbalances, and small samples limited certainty. Conclusions: M+I may reduce stillbirth and some adverse outcomes compared with insulin alone, but most evidence remains low certainty. Further high-quality RCTs are needed.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminPregnancy in DiabeticsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminAntidiabetic agentsFetal outcomeGestational diabetes mellitusHypoglycemic agentsPregnancy complicationsPregnancy outcomeType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID42500179
PMCPMC13399377

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.