Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500180›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2026

Surgical management of endometriosis: surgical techniques, adjuvant therapy, and long-term management Number 10 - 2026.

Agnaldo Lopes da Silva, Sérgio Podgaec, Ricardo de Almeida Quintarios, Júlio César Rosa E Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agnaldo Lopes da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo HorizonteMG Brazil Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8486-7861
Sérgio PodgaecUniversidade de São Paulo São PauloSP Brasil Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9760-6003
Ricardo de Almeida QuintariosUniversidade do Estado do Pará BelémPA Brazil Universidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4642-0612
Júlio César Rosa E SilvaFaculdade de Medicina Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-1328

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

• Surgical outcomes in endometriosis vary substantially according to disease phenotype, symptom profile, and reproductive priorities. • Excisional surgery for ovarian endometriomas is associated with lower recurrence rates but carries a consistent risk of postoperative ovarian reserve impairment. • Surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis is associated with meaningful improvement in pain and quality of life when clinical indications are appropriate and execution is precise, but entails higher surgical complexity and morbidity. • Repeat surgical interventions are associated with diminishing symptomatic benefit and increasing cumulative risk, including adhesion-related morbidity and the loss of both organ function and ovarian reserve. • Postoperative hormonal therapy may reduce symptom recurrence and the likelihood of repeat surgery in women not seeking immediate pregnancy. • Endometriosis surgery should be integrated into a long-term, multidisciplinary care model focused on symptom control and quality of life rather than disease eradication.

Indexed as

EndometriosisFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID42500180
PMCPMC13399493

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.