ArticlePeerJ2026
Evaluating the role of indoor environmental quality in predicting ocular and general sick building syndrome: insights from the AIRMED project.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Modern buildings, designed for energy efficiency often lead to poor indoor air quality (IAQ), combined with prolonged indoor working activity resulting in Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) symptoms among occupants. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of SBS symptoms especially ocular and general symptoms and their association with IAQ and ergonomic factors among office workers in a healthcare facility. Method: A cross-sectional study involving 261 office workers was conducted, assessing demographics, working conditions, and SBS symptoms using questionnaires. Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) parameters were measured, including thermal comfort, chemical, and biological parameters, light, and building inspection. Result: Results revealed a substantial prevalence of ocular (27.2%) and general (22.2%) SBS symptoms, associated with prolonged computer usage and elevated formaldehyde levels. Multivariable analysis revealed that every hour of increase in computer screen time beyond seven hours increased the risk of ocular and general SBS by 21% and 23%, respectively. Formaldehyde concentrations ≥ ocular 0.74 ppm increased the probability of ocular SBS by 5.9 times. Furthermore, repetitive wrist and shoulder movements increased the risk of general SBS by 2.48 times. Conclusion: Recommendations include optimizing IAQ, reducing formaldehyde emissions, and implementing ergonomic workstation strategies to mitigate SBS effects. This study emphasizes the importance of comprehensive workplace interventions for healthier indoor environments and improved occupational health and productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.