Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Therapeutic assessment of

Sreyoshi Routh, Tomsy Joseph, Arya Sreekumar, Venkatraman Manickam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sreyoshi RouthSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Tomsy JosephSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arya SreekumarSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Venkatraman ManickamSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype lacking estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors, which restricts targeted therapies and contributes to poor survival. Conventional chemotherapeutics such as doxorubicin and cisplatin show limited efficacy, significant toxicity, and resistance, underscoring the need for alternative strategies. Methods: The therapeutic efficacy of NELNs was evaluated in the MDA-MB-231 TNBC cell line using Results: NELNs induced significant cytotoxicity, promoted apoptosis, and increased intracellular ROS levels in MDA-MB-231 cells. Flow cytometry confirmed apoptotic induction and revealed alterations in cell cycle progression. Pathway enrichment analysis of previously identified NELN-associated metabolites computationally highlighted arachidonic acid and linoleic acid metabolism, with cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP3A4) emerging as putative targets. Molecular docking predicted favorable binding interactions of NELN metabolites to these targets. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that flower-derived NELNs exerted antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic activity against MDA-MB-231 cells under the tested experimental conditions. Furthermore, network pharmacology analyses generated putative mechanistic insights into pathways relevant to TNBC.

Indexed as

apoptosiscytochrome P450exosome-like nanoparticlesnetwork pharmacologyTNBC

Identifiers

PMID42500301
PMCPMC13395740

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.