ArticleImmunotherapy advances2026
Growth factor supportive care for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia suppresses antitumour immunity in checkpoint blockade-responsive pancreatic cancer.
Article in Immunotherapy advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Growth factors, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, filgrastim), are used for prophylaxis or treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, yet their effects on antitumour immunity remain incompletely understood. We previously found that serum from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with multiagent chemotherapy plus G-CSF drove differentiation of T cell-suppressive monocytes Methods: We evaluated the immunologic and therapeutic impact of G-CSF in two murine PDAC models that differ in their baseline frequencies of infiltrating T cells and in their responsiveness to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Results: In poorly immunogenic, T-cell-low tumours, use of G-CSF did not affect tumour growth or response to chemo- or immunotherapy, although neutrophil recovery was improved in mice receiving FOLFIRINOX and G-CSF compared to chemotherapy alone. In immunogenic tumours with a robust endogenous T-cell response, combination anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy resulted in durable tumour clearance. Combination with G-CSF diminished the effectiveness of checkpoint blockade and resulted in significantly fewer cured mice. Conclusion: G-CSF, commonly used for supportive care with FOLFIRINOX and other chemotherapy regimens, induces systemic immune suppression that can reduce the efficacy of T-cell-targeting immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.