ArticleSage open pathology
Cervical Cytological Findings and Vaginal Microbiota Alterations During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Sage open pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pregnancy induces physiological and microbiological changes in the cervicovaginal environment, which may affect the interpretation of cervical cytology. Accurate screening in this population is essential to identify both benign and pathological alterations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study on 58 conventional Pap smears performed during pregnancy. Cytological findings were classified according to the Bethesda System, and available microbiological and HPV data were analyzed to explore potential relationships. Results: Among the 58 Pap smears, 46.6% were negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy (NILM), while 12.1% showed ASC-US, 10.3% LSIL, 5.2% ASC-H, and 25.9% HSIL. Candida infection and Döderlein-related cytolysis were observed in 8.6% and 8.6% of cases, respectively. HPV genotyping, available in 24 patients, identified several high-risk HPV types. Among cases with available HPV data, high-risk HPV types were more frequently observed in high-grade cytological categories, although this association did not reach statistical significance. Culture-based microbiological data were available only in a very limited subset of patients (n = 6). Conclusions: Cervical cytology during pregnancy remains a valuable screening tool, but its interpretation requires awareness of pregnancy-related changes and potential diagnostic pitfalls. The integration of HPV and microbiological data may provide additional contextual information; however, larger prospective studies with systematic testing are required to clarify the relationship between microbiota, HPV infection, and cytological abnormalities in pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.