ReviewRSC advances2026
Smart wearable biosensors: a transformative synergy between diagnosis and treatment of disease.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smart wearable biosensors represent a significant paradigm shift from one-time sample analysis to real-time biochemical monitoring at the body interface. Besides the flexible design of the device or wireless readout, their clinical utility will also require the reliability of the entire sensing pathway under real physiological conditions. This pathway involves biofluid access to clinical interpretation. Despite rapid progress, many wearable biosensor platforms remain limited by weak biofluid-blood correlation, receptor degradation, biofouling, motion artefacts, sensor drift and insufficient patient-level validation. Thus, a chemistry-to-clinics approach is crucial to assess the analytical reliability and translational readiness of recognition elements, sensing materials, and engineered biointerfaces. Enzymes, antibodies, aptamers, nucleic-acid systems, molecularly imprinted polymers, and nanozymes are discussed within the context of selectivity, stability, antifouling behaviour and suitability for continuous monitoring of sweat, interstitial fluid, tears, wound exudate and breath condensate. The functionality of carbon nanostructures, metal-based nanomaterials, hydrogels, MXenes, metal-organic frameworks and self-powered interfaces are evaluated in terms of their applications in amplification, mechanical conformity, biofluid handling and signal stability. Artificial intelligence is positioned as a support layer for signal correction, calibration, classification, multimodal fusion and predictive interpretation, rather than as a substitute for robust sensing chemistry. This review provides a critical chemistry-to-clinical perspective on smart wearable biosensors and outlines the validation, manufacturing, cybersecurity, post-market surveillance and benchmarking requirements needed for their translation into reliable diagnostic and therapeutic-monitoring technologies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.