Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500538›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Integrative genomic profiling identifies MLPH as a candidate gene in prostate cancer.

Runyi Wang, Jiayu Wang, Zhiyi Zhao, Xiaopeng Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Runyi Wang *Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiayu Wang *Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhiyi Zhao *Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaopeng HuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy with complex genetic underpinnings. This study integrates multi-omics data to prioritize candidate susceptibility genes and evaluate their functional and clinical significance in PCa pathogenesis. Materials and methods: We integrated PCa GWAS summary statistics with GTEx v8 expression quantitative trait locus reference panels to perform cross-tissue and single-tissue transcriptome-wide association studies. Candidate signals were refined using conditional analysis, MAGMA and fastBAT gene-level tests, Summary data-based Mendelian randomization, and Bayesian colocalization. Tumor-context cis-eQTL evidence from TCGA-PRAD was incorporated to prioritize regulatory signals retained in prostate cancer tissues. Prioritized candidates were further assessed using transcriptomic datasets, Human Protein Atlas immunohistochemistry, single-cell RNA-seq analysis, histological grading, preoperative PSA, and established genomic risk signatures. Gene network and pathway enrichment analyses were performed to explore potential biological context. Results: The integrative genetic analyses identified 23 consensus candidate genes supported by multiple association frameworks. SMR and Bayesian colocalization further narrowed the candidate list, and tumor-context cis-eQTL analysis in TCGA-PRAD retained Discussion and conclusion: This integrative genomic analysis prioritizes

Indexed as

colocalizationgenome-wide association studies (GWAS)MLPHprostate cancertranscriptome-wide association studies (TWAS)

Identifiers

PMID42500538
PMCPMC13395884

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.