ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Integrative genomic profiling identifies MLPH as a candidate gene in prostate cancer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy with complex genetic underpinnings. This study integrates multi-omics data to prioritize candidate susceptibility genes and evaluate their functional and clinical significance in PCa pathogenesis. Materials and methods: We integrated PCa GWAS summary statistics with GTEx v8 expression quantitative trait locus reference panels to perform cross-tissue and single-tissue transcriptome-wide association studies. Candidate signals were refined using conditional analysis, MAGMA and fastBAT gene-level tests, Summary data-based Mendelian randomization, and Bayesian colocalization. Tumor-context cis-eQTL evidence from TCGA-PRAD was incorporated to prioritize regulatory signals retained in prostate cancer tissues. Prioritized candidates were further assessed using transcriptomic datasets, Human Protein Atlas immunohistochemistry, single-cell RNA-seq analysis, histological grading, preoperative PSA, and established genomic risk signatures. Gene network and pathway enrichment analyses were performed to explore potential biological context. Results: The integrative genetic analyses identified 23 consensus candidate genes supported by multiple association frameworks. SMR and Bayesian colocalization further narrowed the candidate list, and tumor-context cis-eQTL analysis in TCGA-PRAD retained Discussion and conclusion: This integrative genomic analysis prioritizes
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.