ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Natural products and immune-cell responses in osteoarthritis: mechanisms, evidence maturity, and translational gaps.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly recognized as an immune-associated whole-joint disorder characterized by chronic low-grade inflammation, which contributes to joint degeneration, structural deterioration, and persistent pain. Innate and adaptive immune cells, including macrophages, T cells, neutrophils, and mast cells, participate in OA pathogenesis by releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and matrix-degrading enzymes, as well as by interacting with chondrocytes, synovial fibroblasts, and subchondral bone cells. Natural products, because of their multi-target pharmacological properties, have emerged as potential modulators of this complex immune microenvironment. This review critically appraises current evidence on natural-product interventions modulating OA-associated immune-cell responses, with particular emphasis on mechanistic evidence, evidence maturity, and translational potential. It further compares evidence across immune-cell populations to identify shared mechanisms, population-specific differences, and key translational gaps. Macrophage- and T-cell-associated responses have the most developed evidence base, with relatively consistent evidence supporting modulation of M1-like/M2-like macrophage phenotypes and the T helper 17 (Th17)/regulatory T (Treg) cell balance. Neutrophil- and mast-cell-associated responses represent emerging or auxiliary areas of evidence, as these immune-cell populations may amplify inflammation and pain through reactive oxygen species production, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, degranulation, and inflammatory mediator release. Evidence for B cells, dendritic cells (DCs), and natural killer (NK) cells remains limited; therefore, these immune-cell populations should currently be regarded as potential research directions rather than established therapeutic targets. Most available data derive from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.