Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500748›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026

Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Management for Submandibular Sialolithiasis: Gland Resection Versus Preservation.

Claire Orth, Edward Tannenbaum, Evgeniya Molotkova, Piper Vander Waal, Kailey Henkle, Henry Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire OrthUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3939-2666
Edward TannenbaumUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA.
Evgeniya MolotkovaDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA.
Piper Vander WaalDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA.
Kailey HenkleDepartment of Biostatistics University of Iowa College of Public Health Iowa City Iowa USA.
Henry HoffmanDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4486-855X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Describe long-term outcomes of submandibular sialolithiasis treatment, comparing gland-preserving procedures to gland resection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study with prospective patient-reported outcome assessment study included all patients who underwent initial surgical management of submandibular sialolithiasis by a single surgeon from 2013 to 2018. Patients were contacted in 2024 and surveyed regarding treatment response. The primary outcome was xerostomia at long-term follow-up, measured using the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). Secondary outcomes included stone recurrence, postoperative complications, and "ultimate surgical success," defined as resolution of salivary symptoms without additional interventions during the 5-to-10-year interval following the initial series of procedures. Eighty-two patients were identified; 36 (43.9%) completed follow-up. Results: Of 36 respondents (median follow-up 97.4 months), 11 (30.6%) underwent initial gland resection and 25 (69.4%) underwent initial gland-preserving, sialendoscopy-assisted procedures. Among the preservation group, 1 patient required a second gland-preserving procedure, and 3 ultimately underwent gland removal due to persistent symptoms. Resolution of symptoms after the first procedure occurred in all resection patients (100%) and 18 of 25 (72%) in the preservation group. Among those with preserved glands at follow-up ( Conclusions: Both surgical approaches offer durable outcomes, though gland preservation may carry a higher risk of persistent symptoms and potential need for additional intervention. Xerostomia rates were comparable, suggesting gland preservation does not necessarily reduce long-term xerostomia risk. Level of Evidence: OCEBM Level 4.

Indexed as

gland resectionsalivary stonessialendoscopysubmandibular sialolithiasisxerostomia

Identifiers

PMID42500748
PMCPMC13395574

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.