SynthesisEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
The influence of immersive tools on children's dental anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review assesses the effectiveness of immersive tools, including virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), in reducing dental anxiety among children aged 3-10 years, and compares immersive VR with conventional behaviour management techniques.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across various databases from inception to date. Randomised and non-randomised controlled studies evaluating dental anxiety in children using immersive VR or AR for behaviour management were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for randomised controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised controlled trials. A meta-analysis was conducted with heart rate as the primary outcome measure, and certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADEpro.
resultsThirty-seven studies involving 2,505 children were included, of which 13 studies (n = 819) were pooled for meta-analysis. Immersive VR resulted in a significant reduction in heart rate compared with non-immersive VR (mean difference: - 8.12 bpm; 95% CI -14.69 to- 1.56; p = 0.02) with moderate certainty of the evidence. Comparisons with kaleidoscope distraction favoured immersive VR (mean difference: - 1.59 bpm; 95% CI-4.84 to 1.66). Compared with the Tell-Show-Do technique, immersive VR showed a trend toward lower heart rate (mean difference: -7.92 bpm; 95% CI-16.16 to 0.32).
conclusionAs a non-pharmacological adjunct for reducing dental anxiety in children, immersive VR may be superior to non-immersive distraction techniques, supporting its integration into paediatric dental practice. However, the evidence is primarily based on VR studies, and findings related to AR remain limited and preliminary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42501244What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.