ArticleAJOG global reports2026
Under nutrition and associated factors among pregnant women residing in productive safety net program beneficiary and nonbeneficiary households in West Belesa District, northwest Ethiopia.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malnutrition affects approximately 462 million pregnant women globally. Despite initiatives like the productive safety net program (PSNP) in Ethiopia, evidence comparing maternal undernutrition between PSNP beneficiary and nonbeneficiary households remains limited. This study aimed to compare undernutrition and its associated factors among pregnant women in West Belessa District, Central Gondar Zone. Methods: A community-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted from April 1 to April 30, 2025, among 617 randomly selected pregnant women. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews, and nutritional status was assessed using mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC). Data entry was done using EpiData 3.1 and analyzed with STATA 14. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with undernutrition, with significance set at Results: The overall prevalence of undernutrition was 44.4% (95% CI: 40.5-48.5). Factors significantly associated with undernutrition included poor nutritional knowledge (AOR=5.73, 95% CI: 3.9-8.4), no prenatal dietary advice (AOR=1.89, 95% CI: 1.27-2.83), poorest wealth index (AOR=3.24, 95% CI: 1.75-6.0), and no habit of eating snacks (AOR=1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.16). Conclusion: Undernutrition among pregnant women in West Belessa District remains high. Improving nutritional knowledge, promoting dietary counseling during antenatal care, and addressing socioeconomic disparities are essential to reduce maternal undernutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.