Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42502345›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology

Clinical Outcomes of Postponing Oocyte Retrieval Beyond 40 h After Trigger With Diclofenac Pretreatment Compared With the Routine Paradigm: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Rang Liu, Xinyi Pan, Rui Xiang, Yutong Wang, Shaohong Zhuang, Jiana Huang, Cong Fang, Xiaoyan Liang, Haitao Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rang LiuReproductive Medicine Center The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0727-971X
Xinyi PanReproductive Medicine Center The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Rui XiangReproductive Medicine Center The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Yutong WangReproductive Medicine Center The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Shaohong ZhuangReproductive Medicine Center The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Jiana HuangReproductive Medicine Center The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Cong FangReproductive Medicine Center The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Xiaoyan LiangReproductive Medicine Center The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Haitao ZengReproductive Medicine Center The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-0195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare outcomes of delaying oocyte retrieval beyond 40 h post-trigger with diclofenac versus the conventional workflow. Methods: A total of 4912 cycles were retrospectively screened. Eighty-four delayed cycles and 168 routine cycles from patients who received a single trigger in their first cycle were matched at a 1:2 ratio for age, AMH, COS protocol, and ICSI use and compared. Results: The ratio of the number of oocytes retrieved to the number of follicles ≥ 14 mm on trigger day was significantly higher in the delayed group (1.27 ± 0.42 vs. 1.14 ± 0.47, Conclusions: Delaying oocyte retrieval beyond 40 h post-trigger with diclofenac could be feasible to enhance clinical operational flexibility. Further research is warranted to identify subgroups that may benefit most and to optimize strategies adapted to this extension.

Indexed as

delayed oocyte retrievalNSAIDsovulationpropensity score matchingtrigger

Identifiers

PMID42502345
PMCPMC13401140

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.