ArticleMaterials today. Bio2026
Synergistic integration of flexible bioelectroactive nanofibrous conduits and electrical stimulation for accelerated peripheral nerve regeneration.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repair of peripheral nerve injuries remains a major clinical challenge, motivating the development of bioelectroactive nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) capable of reconstructing the structural and electrophysiological microenvironment required for effective regeneration. Here, we report flexible bioelectroactive nerve guidance conduits (CPC-NGCs) that integrate mechanical compliance with efficient bioelectrical signal transmission, address challenges associated with the repair of peripheral nerve defects. These conduits are fabricated from chitosan, polyethylene oxide, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) via electrospinning, forming a conductive nanofibrous network with a biomimetic fibrous architecture that supports peripheral nerve regeneration. By systematically regulating CNTs content, the hydrophilicity, conductivity, and mechanical properties of the conduits were optimized to achieve stable electrical performance and tissue adaptability. In vitro studies demonstrated that CPC-NGCs promoted PC12 cell viability, neurite extension, and neuronal differentiation. Electrical stimulation (ES) further enhanced neurite alignment and maturation-related marker expression. Moreover, the combination of CPC-NGCs and ES promoted Schwann cell elongation and maturation while modulating macrophage polarization toward a pro-regenerative M2 phenotype, thereby establishing a favorable microenvironment for nerve repair. In a 10 mm rat sciatic nerve defect model, electrically activated CPC-NGCs significantly enhanced axonal regeneration and remyelination, resulting in improved electrophysiological performance, sensory recovery, and motor functional restoration. Histological analyses further confirmed the reconstruction of structurally mature nerve tissue with reduced fibrosis. These findings demonstrate that the synergistic integration of biomimetic conductive conduits and electrical stimulation effectively promotes peripheral nerve regeneration through coordinated regulation of neuronal differentiation, Schwann cell maturation, and immune microenvironment remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.