ArticleRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP2026
Introduction to the 3RsC's cross-platform microphysiological systems evaluation for drug-induced liver injury in collaboration with FDA-CDER.
Article in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a major challenge for drug development, contributing to adverse events in patients and regulatory setbacks. Traditional nonclinical approaches frequently fail to predict DILI due to interspecies differences and complex DILI mechanisms. Microphysiological systems (MPS) offer a promising alternative by recreating dynamic drug exposure, human-relevant metabolism, and organotypic features central to DILI pathogenesis. However, broader industry and regulatory adoption is limited by lack of confidence, platform variability, and lack of benchmarks. This manuscript describes the process of designing a cross-platform evaluation of eight commercially available liver MPS, conducted through a public-private partnership between the 3Rs Collaborative and FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. It ultimately focused on using liver MPS for defined Context of Use: retrospective assessment of elevated liver signals in early clinical trials. The team created a harmonized experimental strategy with blinded compounds, common endpoints, and independent data analysis to define category-level performance expectations rather than rank individual systems. This effort represents the first design of a systematic, category-level comparison of liver MPS for a regulatory application. It provides a blueprint for advancing New Approach Methodologies for regulatory use, strengthening confidence in human-relevant models for drug safety assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.