ArticlePediatric pulmonology2026
Mandibular Movement Monitoring in Children With Neurodisability.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in children is diagnosed using polysomnography (PSG), but children with neurodisability are >3 times more likely to not tolerate leads and sensors. The diagnostic accuracy of Sunrise, a small sensor applied to the chin, has not been assessed in this special population.
objectiveCompare the diagnostic accuracy of Sunrise to simultaneously recorded in-laboratory PSG.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study of children aged 3-18 years with neurodisability, who attended the Queensland Children's Hospital sleep laboratory for diagnostic PSG between February 2024 and September 2025. Sunrise- and PSG-derived measures of sleep disordered breathing were compared, and questionnaire data examining interest in novel sensor technology, and portable, home-based sleep studies were also collected.
resultsThere were 48 children with a neurodisability (mean [SD] age = 11.2 [3.6]; 39% female). For 43 children with complete Sunrise data, sensitivity and specificity for identifying moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) using calibrated MM-ORDI were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.45-1.00) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45-0.79), respectively. The concordance correlation coefficient of the obstructive respiratory disturbance index was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.5-0.8) and the median absolute error was 5.7 (IQR: 2.7-13.1) events per hour. Most carers in attendance preferred in-laboratory sleep studies (56%) to home (33%), but the majority preferred Sunrise (50%) to limited-channel (17%) or full PSG (10%).
conclusionSunrise shows excellent ability to exclude moderate-severe OSA in children with neurodisability with moderate specificity. There is substantial appetite among parents and carers for alternative sleep testing modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.