Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42504556›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2026

The Development of Parental Knowledge of Their Child in NNU and PICU: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences.

Sarah E Seaton, Ashleigh E Butler, Joseph C Manning, Lucy K Smith, Katie Gallagher, Nicola Mackintosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah E SeatonSchool of Healthcare, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8711-4817
Ashleigh E ButlerSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-2854
Joseph C ManningSchool of Healthcare, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-4169
Lucy K SmithSchool of Healthcare, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-0793
Katie GallagherSchool of Healthcare, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Nicola MackintoshSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-6432

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvancements in neonatal and paediatric intensive care have improved survival of children born very preterm or with complex health conditions. However, many of these children will subsequently require admission to paediatric intensive care. How families navigate experiences and knowledge across these different admissions remains poorly understood.

aimTo explore the experiences of parents with a child admitted to both a neonatal unit (NNU) and a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with a focus on the development of parental knowledge. STUDY

designWe conducted an exploratory qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 parents of 15 children who experienced admission to both NNU and PICU. Participants were recruited via national charities and interviewed remotely. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis, focussing on parents' temporal experiences.

findingsParents described knowing their child as a dynamic state evolving throughout the NNU to the PICU. In the NNU, parents initially learned to know their child through hands-on care, often facilitated by staff, though physical and emotional barriers sometimes hindered bonding. Discharge from NNU was a key transition moment, with some parents feeling confident while others felt uncertain about managing their child's healthcare needs at home without the support of staff and medical equipment. At PICU admission, parents brought experiential knowledge, the value of which was not always recognised by healthcare professionals. This lack of acknowledgement sometimes led to missed opportunities for provision of safe care. During PICU stays, parents wanted their expertise respected and integrated into care, particularly for children requiring ongoing specialist care, which was often provided by families, outside of PICU.

conclusionsParental knowledge of their child, and their previous experiences, is vital to support safe care delivery but sometimes overlooked. Recognising parents as expert and equal partners in care can potentially improve safety, communication and family-centred practice. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Neonatal and paediatric healthcare teams should actively acknowledge and incorporate parental expertise during and when transitioning between NNU and PICU. Parents' experiences provide additional insights, which provide opportunities for better care. Improved communication across neonatal and paediatric services may enhance outcomes and parental confidence.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntensive Care Units, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, PediatricParentsAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleProfessional-Family RelationsQualitative Researchneonatal carepaediatric intensive careparent experiencequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID42504556
PMCPMC13402963

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.