ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Dynamic Closed-Loop Medical Record Quality Management Using an AI-Driven Multilevel Quality Control System: Development and Implementation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the core documentation of the clinical diagnosis and treatment process, the quality of medical records is directly related to medical safety and efficiency. However, traditional manual quality control (QC) has limitations such as limited coverage, low efficiency, and inconsistent standards, making it difficult to meet the high standards of modern hospitals.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to develop a medical record QC platform based on AI technology and to build a multilevel QC system relying on the platform to comprehensively improve the form and content of electronic medical records (EMRs).
methodsThis study established a QC rule database based on relevant medical record writing standards, combined deep learning and natural language processing technologies to build an AI-driven QC engine, designed a 4-level QC and management process, and implemented the system in a comprehensive tertiary hospital in China.
resultsAfter applying AI for the first level of QC, the coverage rate of automated initial screening of EMRs reached 100%. On this basis, combined with manual participation in the second to fourth level of QC, a new model of medical record quality management was formed, featuring human-machine collaboration, interaction between QC units and clinical departments, efficient closed-loop operation, and equal emphasis on form and connotation. The completeness, timeliness, consistency, and accuracy of EMRs significantly improved, while various indicators, such as the grade A rate and excellent rate, continued to increase (all P<.001).
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that the implementation of an AI-based 4-level QC management model helped overcome the limitations of traditional manual QC methods to a certain extent, facilitated comprehensive, dynamic, and closed-loop management of EMRs, and effectively improved the overall quality of medical records. This model can provide a reference for other hospitals seeking to reform their QC models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.