ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Patient Perspectives on Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Qualitative Study to Guide Selection of Clinical Trial Endpoints.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The literature on the qualitative experiences of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is limited. Qualitative interviews were conducted to investigate participants' experiences with two types of NHL (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [n = 20] and mantle cell lymphoma [n = 10]) and evaluate the comprehensiveness of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Fatigue, tiredness, body aches, night sweats, lethargy, headache, appetite loss, altered taste, and weakness were the most frequent and bothersome symptoms. Key impacts were decreased physical performance, restricted activity, sadness, distress, fear of recurrence, and worry about future. Most participants expressed positive opinions about the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) (n = 22/28), EORTC QLQ-NHL-High Grade Module 29 (EORTC QLQ-NHL-HG29) (n = 12/16), EORTC QLQ-NHL-Low Grade Module 20 (EORTC QLQ-NHL-LG20) (n = 8/12), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) (n = 10/14), considering them relevant to their experiences (22/27, 13/15, 9/13, and 10/12, respectively). All measures adequately captured their experiences with NHL (QLQ-C30: n = 26/26, NHL-HG29: n = 14/14, NHL-LG20: n = 11/11, and FACT-Lym: n = 12/13). These findings provide a valuable framework for informing the selection of appropriate PRO measures in NHL clinical trials and identifying potentially meaningful trial endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.