Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505508›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Nested Attention Network for Robust Medical Image Segmentation Under Digital Watermarking.

Mohammad J M Zedan, Ahmed A Mohammed, Mohammed A M Abdullah, Ersin Elbasi, Wai Lok Woo, Mohd Asyraf Zulkifley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad J M ZedanDepartment of Computer and Information Engineering, Ninevah University, Mosul 41002, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-2893-0731
Ahmed A MohammedDepartment of Computer and Information Engineering, Ninevah University, Mosul 41002, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-9719-4387
Mohammed A M AbdullahDepartment of Computer and Information Engineering, Ninevah University, Mosul 41002, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-3340-8489
Ersin ElbasiCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 54200, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0002-8603-1435
Wai Lok WooDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8698-7605
Mohd Asyraf ZulkifleyDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4010-3990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital watermarking is widely used to protect medical images in terms of ownership, authenticity, and traceability; however, the embedding process may introduce subtle modifications that can affect the reliability of deep-learning-based clinical analysis. Existing studies have shown that watermarking has a negligible effect on medical image classification; nevertheless, its impact on segmentation performance remains insufficiently explored. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the effects of segmentation model enhancement on watermarked medical image analysis. In this context, three representative watermarking approaches were employed, and five baseline segmentation models, namely U-Net, ResUNet++, SegNet, FCDenseNet, and TernausNet, were evaluated on two benchmark datasets: LIDC-IDRI and BRISC. Additionally, a novel deep learning model with nested attention mechanisms was specifically designed to improve feature extraction and increase sensitivity to subtle pixel-level variations in watermarked images. Segmentation performance was assessed using five standard evaluation metrics, including mean Intersection over Union (mIoU), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95). The experimental results indicate consistently minor performance degradation across both datasets. For the BRISC dataset, the reduction in mIoU ranges from 0.15% to 0.44%, while for the LIDC-IDRI dataset, it ranges from 0.19% to 0.29% compared with the no-watermarking baseline. These findings provide quantitative insight into the compatibility of watermarking techniques for medical image protection with AI-based medical image segmentation systems, highlighting their potential for broader clinical application.

Indexed as

deep learningdigital watermarkingdiscrete wavelet transformleast significant bitmedical imagingsemantic segmentationsingular value decomposition

Identifiers

PMID42505508
PMCPMC13407257

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.