ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Nested Attention Network for Robust Medical Image Segmentation Under Digital Watermarking.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital watermarking is widely used to protect medical images in terms of ownership, authenticity, and traceability; however, the embedding process may introduce subtle modifications that can affect the reliability of deep-learning-based clinical analysis. Existing studies have shown that watermarking has a negligible effect on medical image classification; nevertheless, its impact on segmentation performance remains insufficiently explored. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the effects of segmentation model enhancement on watermarked medical image analysis. In this context, three representative watermarking approaches were employed, and five baseline segmentation models, namely U-Net, ResUNet++, SegNet, FCDenseNet, and TernausNet, were evaluated on two benchmark datasets: LIDC-IDRI and BRISC. Additionally, a novel deep learning model with nested attention mechanisms was specifically designed to improve feature extraction and increase sensitivity to subtle pixel-level variations in watermarked images. Segmentation performance was assessed using five standard evaluation metrics, including mean Intersection over Union (mIoU), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95). The experimental results indicate consistently minor performance degradation across both datasets. For the BRISC dataset, the reduction in mIoU ranges from 0.15% to 0.44%, while for the LIDC-IDRI dataset, it ranges from 0.19% to 0.29% compared with the no-watermarking baseline. These findings provide quantitative insight into the compatibility of watermarking techniques for medical image protection with AI-based medical image segmentation systems, highlighting their potential for broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.