Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505580›Full record

ReviewDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Effect of Medical Chitosan on Clinical Efficacy and Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Qiao Lian, Li-Bing Liang, Cai-Qin Wu, Yan Zhu, Kun-Peng Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiao LianSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.
Li-Bing LiangSchool of Nursing, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.
Cai-Qin WuSchool of Nursing, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.
Yan ZhuDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation, Shanghai Second Rehabilitation Hospital, Shanghai 200431, China.
Kun-Peng LiSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) affects over 300 million people globally, yet current therapies face limitations in efficacy and safety. Chitosan, a natural polysaccharide, has shown conflicting evidence in KOA management. This systematic review evaluates chitosan's clinical effectiveness and defines its optimal application scenarios.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before the end of November 2024 on chitosan and knee osteoarthritis were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, SINOMED, Chinese Medical Journal Network, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, Embase, and SCOPUS. After screening the references, publications meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria was selected. RevMan5.4 software was used to perform the meta-analysis of the data.

resultsA total of 231 articles were retrieved, and 14 RCTs involving 1504 participants were included. For the primary efficacy outcome, pooled analysis of 10 RCTs showed a significantly higher overall clinical response rate in the chitosan group compared with the control group (OR = 5.43, 95% CI = 3.21, 9.18,

conclusionsIntra-articular injection of medical chitosan shows potential benefits for pain relief and clinical efficacy in patients with knee osteoarthritis, with a low incidence of adverse reactions. Nevertheless, the evidence remains promising but preliminary.

Indexed as

chitosanclinical efficacyknee osteoarthritispain reliefsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42505580
PMCPMC13408866

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.