ReviewDentistry journal2026
mHealth for Oral Care in Aging: A Narrative Review of Mobile Applications for Older Adults and Caregivers.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population aging, persistent oral health inequalities, and growing reliance on informal caregiving are creating new challenges for oral healthcare systems worldwide. Mobile health technologies (mHealth) are increasingly being used to support oral health promotion, self-care, monitoring, caregiver assistance, and workforce training. However, it remains unclear whether existing applications adequately address the needs of older adults and their caregivers. This narrative review examined the current landscape of mHealth applications for oral health in aging populations, with particular attention to tools supporting self-care, clinical monitoring, caregiver assistance, and primary healthcare training. Following the SANRA framework, we reviewed studies published between January 2000 and May 2026 and analyzed their functionalities, target users, usability, and the evidence supporting their development and implementation. Applications for oral health education and literacy were the most frequently reported. In contrast, relatively few tools were developed specifically for caregivers, dependent older adults, or individuals with cognitive impairment. Cultural and linguistic adaptation was also uncommon. Across categories, most applications had been evaluated primarily through usability or feasibility studies, with limited evidence regarding clinical effectiveness, long-term outcomes, or integration into routine healthcare services. Viewed in the context of the WHO Decade of Healthy Ageing 2021-2030 and the Global Strategy and Action Plan on Oral Health 2023-2030, these findings suggest that while mHealth may contribute to improving oral healthcare for older adults, important gaps remain in clinical validation, accessibility, and adaptation to diverse populations and care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.