ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Empty Follicle Syndrome: Current Therapeutic Approaches and the Role of Triggering Agents in Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hallmark feature of empty follicle syndrome (EFS) is failure to retrieve oocytes from apparently mature follicles despite adequate ovarian stimulation and appropriate ovulation triggering. Although considered uncommon, with a reported prevalence ranging from 0.2% to 7%, EFS may have a profound clinical and psychological impact and can recur in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. Modern classification systems divide EFS into genuine and false forms. Genuine EFS is potentially associated with intrinsic abnormalities involving luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) signaling, oocyte competence, and cumulus-oocyte interaction, whereas false EFS is primarily attributed to pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic factors resulting in inadequate trigger exposure. Borderline EFS represents a third phenotype characterized by incomplete or partial impairment of final oocyte maturation. This review examines the pharmacodynamics of ovulation-triggering agents, including human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocols, and dual-trigger strategies, and their roles in regulating final oocyte maturation. The molecular aspects of periovulatory signal transduction and the mechanisms of LHCGR activation, epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like pathways, and meiotic resumption in relation to EFS etiopathogenesis will be described. The impact of patient-dependent conditions like obesity, poor ovarian reserve, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and pituitary response on trigger response will be assessed. New approaches like post-trigger monitoring of hormones and rescue treatment with gonadotropins represent a valuable method for avoiding cycle cancellation in patients at risk. Overall, EFS is increasingly regarded not as a single disorder but as a heterogeneous spectrum of periovulatory dysfunction arising from pharmacological, endocrine, and intrinsic ovarian factors that impair completion of final oocyte maturation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.