ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Functional Adhesives for a Restorative Future.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cementation of indirect restorations has undergone a profound change over the past century, evolving from a philosophy of purely mechanical cementation to sophisticated biomaterials science based on adhesion. The aim of this narrative review is to provide essential context for understanding contemporary clinical decision-making. A key aspect is the structural and compositional characteristics of enamel and dentin as bonding substrates, underlining why enamel remains the gold standard, while dentin continues to present significant challenges. The synthesis is based on evidence of adhesive strategies for the four main classes of contemporary restorative materials, such as glass-ceramics (lithium disilicate and leucite), polycrystalline zirconia, resin-matrix ceramics (hybrid ceramics), and indirect composites. Each material was detailed in terms of surface penetration (e.g., hydrofluoric acid etching and air abrasion), chemical coupling (e.g., silanization and MDP-based primers), and appropriate resin cement selection (light-cured, dual-cured, or self-adhesive). A step-by-step clinical protocol is synthesized based on current evidence, integrating critical techniques such as immediate dentin sealing and optimized polymerization. This review concludes that while adhesive resin cements provide predictable long-term results, significant challenges remain, guiding future clinical research and innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.