ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology2026
Entropy generation in the Malpighian tubule and its comparison with the mammalian nephron.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water and electrolyte regulation is essential for organismal survival. In mammals, the nephron operates a futile cycle of ultrafiltration and reabsorption that accounts for most of the entropy generation of the kidney. In contrast, insect Malpighian tubules form urine primarily through electrolyte secretion. Here, we develop a thermodynamic model of Malpighian tubule function in which entropy generation is estimated from electrical dissipation, with cationic urinary flow treated as current and transepithelial voltage as the potential difference. The model is applied to fluid secretion in the Malpighian tubules of the yellow fever mosquito, the stick insect, and the fruit fly, and to fluid reabsorption in the rectum of the desert locust and the fruit fly. The criterion of efficacy is the ratio between entropy generation and water flow, representing the energy dissipated per unit urinary volume. The results are compared with estimates for humans, mice, and dairy cattle, spanning eight orders of magnitude in body mass. The excretory systems of insects are shown to be more economical than those of mammals. Nevertheless, the differences are remarkably small across all species examined, despite the enormous variation in body size. These results confirm the hypothesis, proposed in the 1980s, that Malpighian tubules operate with greater efficacy than mammalian nephrons and further suggest that fundamental thermodynamic constraints shape the efficiency of epithelial transport systems across widely divergent organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.