ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Machine learning-based prediction of perioperative complications in spine surgery: a large-scale model development and validation study.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpinal surgery carries substantial perioperative risks. Early identification of high-risk patients is critical for improving outcomes. Machine learning (ML) can enhance predictive accuracy over traditional risk scores by modeling complex clinical data, but many existing models lack large, heterogeneous cohorts.
objectiveTo develop and validate ML models for predicting perioperative complications in spine surgery, and assess fairness across patient subgroups.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 5,060 adult patients from the SpineReg registry (2015-2023), each with 160 preoperative demographic, clinical, imaging, and patient-reported outcome features. Six ML algorithms-logistic regression (LR), decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, naïve Bayes, random forest (RF), and eXtreme gradient boosting-were trained with 80/20 train-test split, cross-validation, and hyperparameter optimization. Class imbalance was addressed via repeated undersampling. Performance was assessed using area under the ROC curve (AUC), balanced accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), standardized net benefit (sNB), calibration, and fairness metrics.
resultsRF achieved the best performance, obtaining an AUC of 0.87, balanced accuracy of 0.80, PPV of 0.71, and sNB of 0.44. RF maintained robust performance across demographic and surgical subgroups. Key predictors of increased complication risk included sagittal imbalance, and multilevel surgery, whereas degenerative pathology and monosegmental fusion were protective. Sensitivity declined for rare complications but exceeded 75% for most categories.
conclusionsRF-based models can accurately and equitably predict perioperative complications in diverse spine surgery contexts, supporting personalized counseling, targeted monitoring, and optimized resource allocation. Integration into clinical decision support systems may enhance surgical safety and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42507138What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.